Comparing
How Pigsty compares to cloud RDS, Kubernetes operators, and other PostgreSQL solutions
Notice: this post is outdated and re-generated with claude
Pigsty positions itself as a local-first, open-source PostgreSQL platform that challenges traditional cloud database services and complex orchestration platforms. This comparison demonstrates Pigsty's advantages across key dimensions.
Cloud RDS Comparison
AWS RDS PostgreSQL vs Pigsty
| Feature | AWS RDS PostgreSQL | Pigsty |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Managed cloud service | Self-hosted on bare metal/VM/cloud |
| Cost | $200-1,300/core/month | $20-40/core/month hardware cost |
| Licensing | Proprietary + usage fees | AGPLv3 open source |
| Extensions | Limited, AWS-approved only | 400+ extensions freely available |
| Monitoring Metrics | 99 basic metrics | 3,000+ comprehensive metrics |
| Dashboards | CloudWatch basic views | 50+ specialized dashboards |
| Superuser Access | Restricted | Full superuser privileges |
| Data Sovereignty | AWS controlled | Complete local control |
| Offline Operation | Impossible | Full offline capability |
| Migration Flexibility | Vendor lock-in | Multi-cloud portability |
Cost Analysis
Traditional Cloud RDS Pricing:
- AWS RDS: $1,920-$2,640/vCPU/year
- Alibaba Cloud: $200-1,300/core/month
- Azure Database: Similar premium pricing
Pigsty Total Cost of Ownership:
- Hardware: $27/vCPU/year
- Software: Free (open source)
- Savings: 50-95% compared to cloud RDS
Observability Advantage

Pigsty Monitoring Capabilities:
- 3,000+ metrics vs cloud providers' 99-200 metrics
- 638 PostgreSQL-specific metrics for deep database insights
- 50+ pre-built dashboards covering all infrastructure layers
- Real-time query analysis and performance tuning
- Custom dashboard creation with low-code tools
Cloud Provider Limitations:
- Basic CloudWatch/Azure Monitor metrics
- Limited customization options
- Additional costs for enhanced monitoring
- No access to underlying system metrics
Kubernetes Operators Comparison
Traditional K8s Operators vs Pigsty
| Aspect | Kubernetes Operators | Pigsty |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | High learning curve | Simple Ansible-based |
| Dependencies | Kubernetes cluster required | Bare Linux sufficient |
| Resource Overhead | Container orchestration overhead | Native performance |
| Monitoring | Separate monitoring stack needed | Integrated observability |
| Storage | Complex PV/PVC management | Direct storage access |
| Networking | K8s networking complexity | Standard Linux networking |
| Debugging | Multi-layer troubleshooting | Direct system access |
| Operational Burden | Kubernetes + DB operations | Database-focused operations |
Why Choose Pigsty Over K8s Operators
Simplicity Benefits:
- No container orchestration complexity
- Direct hardware access for optimal performance
- Familiar Linux tools for debugging and maintenance
- Reduced attack surface without container layers
Operational Advantages:
- Lower resource overhead compared to containerized solutions
- Easier troubleshooting with direct system access
- Simpler backup/restore operations
- Native OS integration for security and monitoring
PostgreSQL Distributions Comparison
Commercial Distributions
| Feature | EnterpriseDB | Postgres Pro | VMware Postgres | Pigsty |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Licensing | Commercial | Commercial | Commercial | AGPLv3 |
| Cost | High license fees | High license fees | High license fees | Free |
| Extensions | Limited selection | Curated set | VMware-specific | 400+ available |
| Monitoring | Additional purchase | Basic included | vCenter integration | 3,000+ metrics included |
| High Availability | Enterprise feature | Available | Available | Built-in |
| Support | Paid support only | Paid support | VMware support | Community + commercial |
Open Source Alternatives
| Solution | Focus Area | Pigsty Advantage |
|---|---|---|
| Patroni | HA clustering only | Complete platform with monitoring |
| PostgreSQL Helm Charts | K8s deployment | No K8s dependency, simpler ops |
| Postgres Operator | K8s orchestration | Native performance, easier management |
| TimescaleDB Cloud | Time-series focus | General-purpose with time-series support |
| Supabase | Backend-as-a-Service | Full infrastructure control |
Multi-Cloud Strategy
Vendor Lock-in Avoidance
Cloud Provider Lock-in Risks:
- Proprietary APIs and tooling
- Data transfer costs for migration
- Feature dependency on specific platforms
- Pricing changes and service discontinuation
Pigsty Multi-Cloud Benefits:
- Portable across any Linux environment
- Consistent operations regardless of underlying infrastructure
- Freedom to negotiate with cloud providers
- Hybrid deployment capabilities
Migration Flexibility
graph TB
A[Existing PostgreSQL] --> B[Pigsty Migration Tool]
B --> C[Cloud Provider A]
B --> D[Cloud Provider B]
B --> E[On-Premises]
B --> F[Hybrid Deployment]
C --> G[Cross-Cloud Replication]
D --> G
E --> G
F --> GMigration Capabilities:
- Logical replication for live migration
- Point-in-time recovery across environments
- Configuration portability via Infrastructure as Code
- Zero-downtime migration procedures
Extension Ecosystem
Extension Availability Comparison
| Category | Cloud RDS | Pigsty |
|---|---|---|
| Analytics | Limited (no pg_duckdb) | Full OLAP stack |
| Vector/AI | Basic pgvector | pgvector, pgml, pg_embedding |
| Geospatial | PostGIS only | PostGIS + advanced GIS extensions |
| Time Series | Basic TimescaleDB | TimescaleDB + specialized tools |
| Graph | Not available | Apache AGE + graph extensions |
| Search | Basic text search | Advanced search + vector hybrid |
| Monitoring | None | pg_stat_monitor + custom metrics |
Enterprise Extensions
Pigsty Includes:
- pg_duckdb: Extreme analytics performance
- PostgresML: In-database machine learning
- Citus: Distributed PostgreSQL
- PostGIS: Advanced geospatial capabilities
- pgvector: Vector similarity search
- TimescaleDB: Time-series optimization
Cloud Limitations:
- Restricted extension catalog
- Version dependencies
- Installation restrictions
- Limited configuration options
Performance Characteristics
Hardware Optimization
Pigsty Performance Advantages:
- Direct hardware access without virtualization overhead
- Custom kernel tuning for database workloads
- NUMA awareness and CPU affinity optimization
- Storage optimization for specific workload patterns
Benchmark Results:
- 2M rows/second query throughput on optimized hardware
- 1M rows/second write performance
- 75µs 4K random read latency with NVMe storage
- 3M IOPS sustained performance
Efficiency Gains:
- Eliminated virtualization overhead
- Direct I/O access patterns
- Custom memory management
- Optimized network stack
Security and Compliance
Security Model Comparison
| Security Aspect | Cloud RDS | Pigsty |
|---|---|---|
| Data Location | Cloud provider controlled | Fully controlled |
| Encryption | Provider-managed keys | Self-managed PKI |
| Access Control | Platform-dependent | Full administrative control |
| Audit Logging | Limited visibility | Complete audit trail |
| Compliance | Provider certifications | Direct compliance control |
| Vulnerability Management | Provider responsibility | Direct security management |
Data Sovereignty
Pigsty Sovereignty Benefits:
- Complete data ownership and control
- Local compliance with data protection regulations
- No third-party data access concerns
- Custom security policies implementation
- Air-gapped deployment capabilities
Decision Framework
When to Choose Pigsty
Ideal Use Cases:
- Cost-sensitive deployments requiring significant savings
- High-performance applications needing optimal resource utilization
- Compliance-critical environments requiring data sovereignty
- Complex analytics workloads needing advanced extensions
- Multi-cloud strategies avoiding vendor lock-in
- Existing infrastructure with available hardware resources
When to Consider Alternatives
Cloud RDS Advantages:
- Minimal operational overhead for small teams
- Quick proof-of-concept development
- Geographic distribution without infrastructure management
- Compliance certifications already established
Migration Path:
- Start with cloud RDS for rapid development
- Migrate to Pigsty for production cost optimization
- Maintain hybrid deployments for specific use cases
Pigsty delivers enterprise-grade PostgreSQL capabilities with significant cost savings, superior observability, and complete operational control, making it a compelling alternative to cloud database services and complex orchestration platforms.